What does this Mag7 page help me understand?

It gives you a single page to compare the current setup across Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Meta, Alphabet, and Tesla before you drill into a specific ticker.

What do the signal labels mean?

Treat them as compact analyst-style summaries. They help you see where the model reads improving leadership, fading momentum, or a more defensive regime.

Why is supply-chain context included?

Because relative performance versus a company’s supplier basket can show whether a move looks broad-based and durable or narrow and fragile.

How should I use the archive?

Open the archive when you want to compare today’s snapshot with prior published updates instead of relying on one isolated reading.

What is the fastest review sequence if I only have a minute?

Start with today’s leader card, then the laggard card, then open the latest archive note to see whether that spread is persisting or reversing versus last week.

How fresh is this snapshot?

Use both lines in the header: Last updated (UTC) shows pipeline freshness, while Market data date shows the latest trading session. Data is considered stale if the pipeline timestamp gets older than 180 minutes.

← Back to markets

Magnificent 7 stock analysis hub

A free analysis hub for readers who want a fast, credible read on which Mag7 names are leading, lagging, or showing fragile momentum right now.

Quick jumps: editor brief · comparison dashboard · weekly archive

What this page does: it gives you one clear cross-Mag7 view, then sends you deeper into single-stock pages and the weekly archive when you need more context.

Updated 2026-03-25T17:11:46.172Z · Snapshot age: 2 min ago (2 min)

Market data date: 2026-03-25 · lag 0 days vs run timestamp

Use this second line to avoid mistaking a healthy pipeline run for a fresh trading session during weekends, holidays, or post-close gaps.

Monitor inputs are available and within freshness threshold.

How to read it: stronger labels usually point to broader leadership versus benchmarks and suppliers; weaker labels suggest thinner participation, fading strength, or a more defensive setup.

Decision rule: validate today’s leader/laggard pair against at least one prior weekly archive note before treating the move as durable.

Archive: Mag7 weekly archive

Fast action path (90 seconds): open today’s leader card, then open the latest archive note and compare whether leadership is strengthening or fading before making any position-sized decision.

Open latest archive note

Today’s Mag7 editor brief

Use this as a quick narrative layer before opening individual ticker pages.

Leadership leader vs laggard is currently AMZN (0.46 avg z-score) versus GOOGL (-1.14).
3/7 names are beating their benchmark on 1W, which reads as mixed participation.
Dispersion is widest on 1M (spread 2.38), so this is the clearest horizon for cross-ticker relative-strength checks.
Regime mix across cards: 0 risk-on, 5 mixed, 2 risk-off setups.

Start with AMZN (leader) Fastest way to inspect the strongest current setup and then compare down the stack. Best first click when you want the cleanest example of current Mag7 leadership. Stress-test with GOOGL Check whether weakness is isolated or part of a broader market tone shift. Best second click when you want to challenge the bullish read and look for broader fragility. Validate in archive history Confirm if today’s spread matches the last weekly notes or marks a potential reversal. Best third click when you want historical confirmation before trusting today's cross-Mag7 spread.

Reader navigation deck

If you only have 2-3 minutes, use this path to keep context while moving between live snapshot, archive evidence, and ticker deep-dives.

Reader navigation deck: use the hub for the broad setup, the archive for proof over time, and peer pages when you want a sharper relative-strength read.

Live Mag7 hub Step back to the full cross-Mag7 setup before leaning too hard on a single name. Best first stop when you want the broad board before choosing a deeper read. Weekly archive Check whether today's setup looks like continuation, exhaustion, or a reversal versus earlier weekly notes. Best when the live read feels noisy and you need a calmer historical baseline. Latest weekly note (Mar 3, 2026) Most names moved back toward neutral signal language after late-Feb shocks; NVDA and TSLA remained highest-volatility watch items. Published weekly note · quickest path to recent historical context.

Fast compare path: open peers that sharpen the current read, not just adjacent names — NVDA, TSLA, MSFT

Why this read is built for credibility

Timestamped snapshot with explicit freshness/status text.
Signal labels cross-checked against benchmark and supplier-relative behavior.
Permanent archive pages so prior calls remain inspectable.

AAPL

Apple

Consumer Electronics

Regime

Neutral

Signal

Buy

Investment read

Trend is balanced. Constructive setup. Use the windows below to judge whether leadership looks broadening or fading.

vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)+2.71%

vs supplier basket+8.04%

vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)-3.47%

vs supplier basket+5.43%

vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)-1.29%

vs supplier basket-17.97%

Window	vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)	vs supplier basket
1W	+2.71%	+8.04%
1M	-3.47%	+5.43%
3M	-1.29%	-17.97%

Open AAPL analysis page →

MSFT

Microsoft

Systems Software / Cloud

Regime

Risk-off

Signal

Reduce

Investment read

Defensive regime is active. Downside risk rising. Use the windows below to judge whether leadership looks broadening or fading.

vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)-4.26%

vs supplier basket-7.90%

vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)-1.47%

vs supplier basket-4.76%

vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)-18.57%

vs supplier basket-43.82%

Window	vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)	vs supplier basket
1W	-4.26%	-7.90%
1M	-1.47%	-4.76%
3M	-18.57%	-43.82%

Open MSFT analysis page →

NVDA

NVIDIA

GPU / AI Compute

Regime

Neutral

Signal

Hold

Investment read

Trend is balanced. Wait-and-see setup. Use the windows below to judge whether leadership looks broadening or fading.

vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)+0.24%

vs supplier basket-3.03%

vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)-4.05%

vs supplier basket+3.06%

vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)+2.35%

vs supplier basket-19.27%

Window	vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)	vs supplier basket
1W	+0.24%	-3.03%
1M	-4.05%	+3.06%
3M	+2.35%	-19.27%

Open NVDA analysis page →

AMZN

Amazon

E-commerce + AWS

Regime

Neutral

Signal

Buy

Investment read

Trend is balanced. Constructive setup. Use the windows below to judge whether leadership looks broadening or fading.

vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)+1.99%

vs supplier basket-3.09%

vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)+4.74%

vs supplier basket+5.05%

vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)-2.33%

vs supplier basket-40.72%

Window	vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)	vs supplier basket
1W	+1.99%	-3.09%
1M	+4.74%	+5.05%
3M	-2.33%	-40.72%

Open AMZN analysis page →

GOOGL

Alphabet

Digital Ads + Cloud

Regime

Risk-off

Signal

Reduce

Investment read

Defensive regime is active. Downside risk rising. Use the windows below to judge whether leadership looks broadening or fading.

vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)-4.40%

vs supplier basket-4.88%

vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)-3.27%

vs supplier basket-11.21%

vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)-1.15%

vs supplier basket+0.06%

Window	vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)	vs supplier basket
1W	-4.40%	-4.88%
1M	-3.27%	-11.21%
3M	-1.15%	+0.06%

Open GOOGL analysis page →

Window	vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)	vs supplier basket
1W	-1.75%	-2.82%
1M	-3.23%	-3.95%
3M	-4.60%	-8.56%

Tesla

EV OEM

Regime

Neutral

Signal

Hold

Investment read

Trend is balanced. Wait-and-see setup. Use the windows below to judge whether leadership looks broadening or fading.

vs Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR (XLY)-1.15%

vs supplier basket+1.25%

vs Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR (XLY)+0.13%

vs supplier basket-6.57%

vs Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR (XLY)-10.96%

vs supplier basket-43.12%

Window	vs Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR (XLY)	vs supplier basket
1W	-1.15%	+1.25%
1M	+0.13%	-6.57%
3M	-10.96%	-43.12%

Open TSLA analysis page →

Cross-Mag7 comparison dashboard

Use this matrix when you want one premium-style comparison layer before drilling into any ticker page. Z-score ranks relative setup strength; relative returns show spread vs benchmark and supplier basket.

Leadership snapshot by horizon

1W: Leader AAPL (Buy) · Laggard GOOGL (Reduce)
1M: Leader AMZN (Buy) · Laggard NVDA (Hold)
3M: Leader NVDA (Hold) · Laggard TSLA (Hold)

What the comparison table says right now

Composite leadership

Strongest across 1W/1M/3M: AMZN (0.46 average z-score). Weakest: GOOGL (-1.14).

Participation breadth

1W: 3/7 tickers beating benchmark (43%)
1M: 2/7 tickers beating benchmark (29%)
3M: 1/7 tickers beating benchmark (14%)

Dispersion check

Widest split: 1M (spread 2.38 z-score points). Tightest: 3M (spread 2.24).

Use these summary signals to decide where to dive next: compare the strongest vs weakest ticker pages, then verify whether the weekly archive supports continuation or reversal.

Ticker	Current setup	1W z-score	1W vs benchmark	1W vs suppliers	1M z-score	1M vs benchmark	3M z-score	3M vs benchmark
AAPL	Buy	0.73	+2.71%	+8.04%	-0.34	-3.47%	0.14	-1.29%
AMZN	Buy	0.53	+1.99%	-3.09%	0.85	+4.74%	-0.01	-2.33%
NVDA	Hold	0.06	+0.24%	-3.03%	-1.53	-4.05%	0.67	+2.35%
TSLA	Hold	-0.04	-1.15%	+1.25%	0.74	+0.13%	-1.57	-10.96%
META	Hold	-0.38	-1.75%	-2.82%	-0.68	-3.23%	-0.22	-4.60%
MSFT	Reduce	-0.82	-4.26%	-7.90%	0.74	-1.47%	-0.91	-18.57%
GOOGL	Reduce	-1.57	-4.40%	-4.88%	-0.66	-3.27%	-1.18	-1.15%

Pick your reader path

Tip: if you review this hub weekly, bookmark this page and pair it with the archive link to reduce context switching.

If you need a fast macro read

Scan all seven cards first, then open only the names where leadership or weakness clearly diverges from peers.

If you already track one ticker

Jump straight into that ticker page, then compare it with two peers to avoid single-name tunnel vision.

If today feels noisy

Use the archive to compare this snapshot versus the last 1-3 weekly notes before changing your base view.

Where to go next

Compare today’s extremes directly: AMZN vs GOOGL.
Open a ticker page if you want company-specific context and benchmark-relative detail.
Open the archive if you want to compare this setup with prior published updates.
Use the timestamp and status line as a hard freshness check before leaning on short-term changes.

Direct ticker pages

Quick FAQ

What does this Mag7 page help me understand? It gives you a single page to compare the current setup across Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Meta, Alphabet, and Tesla before you drill into a specific ticker.
What do the signal labels mean? Treat them as compact analyst-style summaries. They help you see where the model reads improving leadership, fading momentum, or a more defensive regime.
Why is supply-chain context included? Because relative performance versus a company’s supplier basket can show whether a move looks broad-based and durable or narrow and fragile.
How should I use the archive? Open the archive when you want to compare today’s snapshot with prior published updates instead of relying on one isolated reading.
What is the fastest review sequence if I only have a minute? Start with today’s leader card, then the laggard card, then open the latest archive note to see whether that spread is persisting or reversing versus last week.
How fresh is this snapshot? Use both lines in the header: Last updated (UTC) shows pipeline freshness, while Market data date shows the latest trading session. Data is considered stale if the pipeline timestamp gets older than 180 minutes.