What is this ticker page for?

It is a quick company-level read: signal direction, relative performance context, and where supplier sensitivity looks strongest.

How should I read N/A contribution values?

N/A means an input is missing or excluded for that horizon. Treat it as incomplete coverage, not as zero impact.

How should I use 1W vs 1M vs 3M contributions?

Use 1W for short-term pressure, 1M for trend confirmation, and 3M for broader direction. Divergence across horizons often matters more than any single number.

Can this replace your own due diligence?

No. Use it as an analysis shortcut, then validate key assumptions against primary filings, earnings commentary, and live price action.

← Back to markets

← Back to Mag7 hub

Apple (AAPL) stock analysis

A reader-first page for understanding whether Apple currently looks stronger, weaker, or more fragile than the headline move alone suggests.

Current read: Buy in a neutral regime.

Updated 2026-03-25T18:25:45.546Z · Benchmark: Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)

Monitor inputs are available and within freshness threshold.

Why this page exists: it turns signal output into something readable — what changed, how the stock is behaving versus peers and benchmarks, and where supply-chain exposure may confirm or weaken the move.

Archive: Mag7 weekly archive

Continue your read without context loss

After AAPL, jump to the live board, the latest note, and a few comparison names to avoid single-ticker tunnel vision.

Reader navigation deck: use the hub for the broad setup, the archive for proof over time, and peer pages when you want a sharper relative-strength read.

Start here in 30 seconds

Open the live hub for the current cross-Mag7 setup.
Open one peer page if you want a stronger relative-strength check.
Use the archive only after that, to verify continuation versus reversal.

Live Mag7 hub Step back to the full cross-Mag7 setup before leaning too hard on a single name. Best first stop when you want the broad board before choosing a deeper read. Weekly archive Check whether today's setup looks like continuation, exhaustion, or a reversal versus earlier weekly notes. Best when the live read feels noisy and you need a calmer historical baseline. Latest weekly note (Mar 3, 2026) Most names moved back toward neutral signal language after late-Feb shocks; NVDA and TSLA remained highest-volatility watch items. Published weekly note · quickest path to recent historical context.

Fast compare path: open peers that sharpen the current read, not just adjacent names — GOOGL, MSFT, TSLA

AAPL

Apple

Consumer Electronics

Regime

Neutral

Signal

Buy

Investment read

Trend is balanced. Constructive setup. Use the windows below to judge whether leadership looks broadening or fading.

vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)+2.62%

vs supplier basket+7.88%

vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)-3.55%

vs supplier basket+5.28%

vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)-1.38%

vs supplier basket-18.13%

Window	vs Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)	vs supplier basket
1W	+2.62%	+7.88%
1M	-3.55%	+5.28%
3M	-1.38%	-18.13%

Comparable performance

Normalized index view

All lines rebased to 100 at window start for direct relative comparison.

AAPL93.31

Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)96.87

Supply-chain basket88.03

Position vs Mag7 peers

AAPL currently ranks #1 of 7 on the 1W normalized strength score (0.71). This helps avoid single-name tunnel vision.

Stronger setups right now

AMZN (Amazon) · Buy
NVDA (NVIDIA) · Hold

Weaker setups right now

GOOGL (Alphabet) · Reduce
MSFT (Microsoft) · Reduce

At a glance

Signal: Buy — a compact summary of the current setup.
Regime: Neutral — the broader tone behind the signal.
How to use it: read this as an analyst shortcut, then compare it with the chart, recent news flow, and the archive before making decisions.

What to watch next

Constructive relative momentum with supportive breadth
Deterministic rules: 1W/1M/3M spreads vs QQQ are 2.62% / -3.55% / -1.38%; current z-score 0.71.
Largest basket weight is TSMC at 45.0% — monitor whether it confirms or diverges from AAPL's next leg.
Coverage quality check: 1W supplier contribution coverage is 68%, while 3M coverage is 68%. Large gaps can distort conviction.

Where to go next

Back to full Mag7 monitor Re-check the cross-company board before making single-name conclusions. Open weekly archive Compare this setup with prior weekly notes to see if tone is improving or degrading. Compare with AMZN Amazon currently reads as buy. Compare with NVDA NVIDIA currently reads as hold.

AAPL in the weekly archive

Use this to connect the live setup with prior published calls on the same ticker, so you can quickly check continuity versus reversal.

Latest AAPL archive mention: 2026-02-03

Mag7 weekly update: breadth softening after Jan

2026-02-03

Mag7 weekly update: breadth softening after Jan

After a strong January start, breadth softened and monitoring shifted toward validating whether 1W weakness would bleed into 1M.

2026-01-20

Mag7 weekly update: post-holiday trend check

The monitor tracked whether post-holiday momentum was sustainable, with focus on supplier basket consistency across horizons.

2026-01-06

Mag7 weekly update: year-start baseline

First archived 2026 snapshot establishing baseline signal and regime references for recurring weekly reviews.

Browse full weekly archive

Supply-chain basket

This basket is the supporting cast behind the stock. It helps show whether momentum is spreading through the ecosystem or staying isolated in the headline name.

AAPL upstream hardware basket · Weighting method: BOM sensitivity proxy (deterministic fixed weights)

TSMC Foundry 45.0%

1W contribution +1.80%

1M contribution -6.34%

3M contribution +12.53%

Ticker: TSM

Murata Manufacturing RF components 23.0%

1W contribution -2.65%

1M contribution -4.20%

3M contribution +3.58%

Ticker: 6981.T

Supplier	Role	Weight	1W contrib	1M contrib	3M contrib
TSMC (TSM)	Foundry	45.0%	+1.80%	-6.34%	+12.53%
Murata Manufacturing (6981.T)	RF components	23.0%	-2.65%	-4.20%	+3.58%

Quick FAQ

What is this ticker page for? It is a quick company-level read: signal direction, relative performance context, and where supplier sensitivity looks strongest.
How should I read N/A contribution values? N/A means an input is missing or excluded for that horizon. Treat it as incomplete coverage, not as zero impact.
How should I use 1W vs 1M vs 3M contributions? Use 1W for short-term pressure, 1M for trend confirmation, and 3M for broader direction. Divergence across horizons often matters more than any single number.
Can this replace your own due diligence? No. Use it as an analysis shortcut, then validate key assumptions against primary filings, earnings commentary, and live price action.